top of page

The latest KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey shows the average U.S. family premium has soared past $27,000 a year. That’s the cost of a new car—just to stay insured.


The recent government shutdown over ACA subsidies misses the real issue. Americans across the board—whether covered by ACA, Medicare, or employer plans—can no longer afford healthcare. The crisis isn’t who pays the bill; it’s why the bill is so high.


We know the causes:


 • Overtreatment and waste.

 • Fragmented care that drives duplication and error.

 • The collapse of primary care, worsening outcomes and cost.

 • End-of-life overtreatment that prolongs suffering.

 • A trillion dollars a year lost to administrative complexity.


The solution isn’t spending more on insurance. It’s redesigning the system itself—simplifying administration, restoring primary care, and aligning payment with better health and humane outcomes.


We can fix this—but not by doing things the old way.


Learn more at www.thejourneys-end.org.


👉 Join the conversation on healthcare reform—your ideas matter.


 
 
 

“Hospices owned by private equity firms yield higher profit margins and spend fewer dollars on direct patient care," a new study in Health Affairs found. For the study, researchers examined revenue and expense data among providers using four types of ownership models: PE-backed, publicly traded companies, other for-profit entities, and nonprofits. PE-owned agencies reported the highest profits and lowest spending on patient care. 


"Our findings suggest that PE-owned hospices may follow distinct operational strategies, emphasizing nursing facility-based care and administrative efficiency while limiting direct patient-care investments,” the study indicated. "Reduced spending on patient care may compromise hospice quality and shift costs to other areas of the healthcare system."


Health Affairs is absolutely correct that PE-owned hospices are hurting end-of-life care. The report goes on to suggest that policymakers should consider revising the hospice payment model to address this inequity in payments. Unfortunately, the report merely suggests tweaking the existing per diem model - this solution will not work. The manipulation of coding and cherry-picking patients while skimping on care is the for-profit operating strategy.


We need a payment model that doesn’t reward cherry-picking patients or encourage coding manipulation for payment. The entire payment model for hospice is designed to create these outcomes, and tweaking it will not solve the problem. The fact is that hospice services are neither complex nor that expensive.


In this sector of healthcare services, a simple cost-based reimbursement model would be ideal. It would also eliminate any difference in profit margin and focus competition on the quality of care. Go to my book, The Journey’s End, to learn more about how and why this payment model should be adopted by policymakers. www.thejourneys-end.org.



 
 
 

I came across this article in the Wall Street Journal about Ozzy Osbourne’s memoir Last Rites, which offers a raw look at the final chapters of his life. What struck me most wasn’t just the drama of his health battles or the weight of his public persona—but rather how Osbourne confronts mortality.


That resonated with me because it echoes many of the ideas in The Journey’s End.


Here’s what these two works teach us about life, death, and how we carry ourselves in between:


1. Facing the inevitable with honesty


Osbourne does not shy away from admitting mistakes and frailties. He reflects on health crises, family dynamics, and what it means to come to terms with decline.


The Journey’s End argues that our culture overemphasizes “fighting to the last breath,” often at the cost of dignity and meaning. Instead, it encourages readers to accept life’s limits and make intentional decisions about how we die. 


Together, they suggest that courage isn’t only in defiance, but also in surrendering to what’s beyond one’s control.


2. Legacy is not what we build—but how we end


Ozzy’s memoir is, in part, an effort to shape how he’ll be remembered—warts, triumphs, humor and all.


The Journey’s End emphasizes the importance of “death literacy” (knowing one’s options, putting one’s wishes in writing) so that one’s final act aligns with one’s values. 


The intersection is powerful: we rarely get to control how long our story runs, but we can influence its final pages.


3. The cost of over-medicalizing life’s final chapters


Ozzy’s memoir recounts invasive surgeries, complications like sepsis, and repeated recoveries—an experience many in the public eye might fear or conceal. 


The Journey’s End critiques the U.S. system’s over-reliance on aggressive care near death, often because of payment models and cultural expectations to “do everything.” 


In both, there’s tension between extending life and living it well in one’s last chapter.


🤔 What can we take into our own lives?


Encourage conversations about end-of-life wishes and respect that sometimes the bravest decision is not to push further, but to step back.


Recognize that a narrative is unfinished until its close—and that how we approach that closure matters as much as how we began.


In closing, I’d love to hear how Last Rites or The Journey’s End (or both) shifted how you think about endings in life.



 
 
 

Get in Touch

  • Linkedin

Thank you for your message!

bottom of page